bracket
what should be said.

A curated collection of wild, outrageous, and hilarious profanity definitions and pronunciations for your churning, educational learning, and entertainment.

Results for "2 Kings 16:19"

2 kings 16:19

Definition: Now the rest of the acts of Ahaz which he did, [are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?


Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 16:19. It's a little tricky, but here’s what it means in plain terms: Basically, this verse is saying that the mistakes and actions of King Ahaz – things he did before his death – are not part of the official, recorded history of Judah. Here’s a more detailed explanation: “Now the rest of the acts…” : This refers to the remaining events or actions of Ahaz after he died. “…of Ahaz which he did” : This is key. It means that the things Ahaz did before his death are being considered. “[are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?” : This is the crucial part. The “book of the chronicles” was a record kept by the people of Judah – basically, their history books. This verse suggests that these actions weren’t officially documented or recorded in this chronicle. What does it mean practically? It implies that Ahaz's reign was marked by significant problems and perhaps even serious wrongdoing. The fact that his actions aren’t included in the official record suggests they were not considered important enough to be thoroughly documented. It could hint at a period of instability or neglect within Judah during his time. In short, it's saying that there are some things Ahaz did that weren’t properly recorded in the historical account of his kingdom. Important Note: This verse is often interpreted as a warning about the potential for corruption and mismanagement within the kings of Judah. It’s a reminder to be careful and diligent in recording history – because even seemingly small errors can have significant consequences! --- Would you like me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the historical context of this verse? Offer some potential interpretations of what it might mean?